Should You Teach Print or Cursive Handwriting First?

Affiliate and Referral links are used below to promote products I love and recommend. I receive a commission on any purchases made through these links. Please see my disclosure policy for more details. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

A few weeks ago I shared a post on my Facebook page that was crazy popular. When I shared it I had no idea it would be that popular, but looking back I should not have been so surprised that people shared it. The entire point of the post was about how cursive handwriting should actually be taught first instead of print. The article had a lot of valid points and it definitely got a lot of people talking about this topic.

I decided to take some time and research this to see what other researchers and professionals thought about teaching cursive first and share that with you today. So if you are wondering whether to teach print or cursive handwriting first, here is what you need to know.

Should you start with cursive handwriting or print/manuscript handwriting first?

Benefits of Cursive Handwriting

There have been many articles circulating about the benefits of cursive handwriting. Since the adoption of Common Core Standards by many states in the United States, most schools have taken cursive handwriting out of their teaching because it is not included in the new standards.

However cursive is still a very important skill from a cognitive standpoint for the following reasons:

  • Hand-eye coordination
  • Sensory-motor coordination
  • Thinking memory
  • Dynamically engages both hemispheres of the brain
  • Visual recognition requirements create a broader repertoire of letter representation (Source: Blumenfeld)

Why Teach Cursive First?

There are many areas of the world that teach cursive handwriting first. In fact, many of my overseas readers commented on Facebook that European countries still teach cursive first instead of print. Dr. Maria Montessori also believed in teaching cursive handwriting first and many Montessori schools do so to this day.

Here are some reasons why you might consider teaching cursive handwriting first:

  • Ease of teaching cursive – There are 3 main strokes – under curve, over curve and up and down. Print has at least 6 including various shapes and perfect circles i.e. pre-writing lines.
  • Prevents reversals and confusion of letters – “b” and “d” are the most common reversals in print.
  • Less potential for errors – cursive is a continuous, fluid movement, which leaves room for fewer errors)
  • Enforces skills and patterns for reading and writing – in cursive, all lower case letters start at the bottom, as opposed to print which starts at various points depending on the letter.
  • Prevents too much space between letters and words – The flow of cursive handwriting is from left to right which encourages spatial discipline. In print, children often have letters too close together or words spaced too far apart.
  • Helps left-handed children – This one really surprised me, but makes sense. With print, the left-handed child will write printing from left to right but will cover what he has written with his arms. This is called the hook position. In cursive writing, the left-handed child learns to write from the bottom up and turns the paper clockwise which increases comfort and legibility.
    • (Source: Blumenfeld & Logic of English – see below for links)

Basics of Print or Manuscript Handwriting

Print (manuscript) handwriting is what most schools and preschools in the US start with for letter formation and recognition. There are some basic prewriting lines that are important for preschoolers to know BEFORE they attempt to print letters.

  • Vertical – (Age 2 imitates, age 3 copies/masters)
  • Horizontal  – (Age 2 imitates, age 3 copies/masters)
  • Circle – (Age 2, age 3 copies/masters)
  • Cross shape (+) – (Age 3 imitates, age 4 copies)
  • Right/Left Diagonal Line – (Age 4)
  • Square – (Age 4)
  • X shape – (Age 4)
  • Triangle (Age 5)

Ideally, a child should not be learning to print a letter of the alphabet until these pre-writing lines are mastered. However, most children entering Kindergarten (age 5) are already expected to know how to write their names and also form most letters of the alphabet. Developmentally, this is not always appropriate.

Print or manuscript handwriting involves hand-eye coordination as well, however, each letter starts at a new point and a student needs to be able to pick up the pencil and place it at the appropriate starting point of each letter in order to produce legible work that is also spelled correctly.

Letter reversals are also common in print or manuscript handwriting, particularly with “d” and “b”, “p” and q”, “t” and “f” etc. This is often due to underdeveloped visual motor skills and visual discrimination.

Capital letters are usually easier for a child to learn first since they do not involve as many circle shapes as lower case and also the starting points are typically at the top of the line. Many handwriting programs, such as Handwriting Without Tears® (HWT) use the capital letter first approach when teaching handwriting.

Occupational Therapists and often dubbed as the “handwriting therapists” because so many of the students we see in a school setting have handwriting concerns. An OTs job is to look at any underlying reasons as to why the child may be struggling with handwriting such as weak core and shoulder strength, un-integrated reflexes from birth, weak fine motor skills, weak visual motor skills, bilateral coordination, and crossing midline skills. These things are also just as important for children learning to use cursive handwriting.

Learning the pre-writing lines is a huge key to handwriting success, which is why I wrote my Basic Shapes for Beginners – A Hands-On Approach to Prewriting Strokes for Kids book.

The Case for Cursive Handwriting?

Most U.S. schools do not introduce cursive handwriting until 2nd or 3rd grade (sometimes even 4th grade). I know one of the schools I worked at didn't even formally teach it, they just gave a home/summer packet on it between 3rd and 4th grade.

As you can see from the information above, introducing cursive handwriting earlier than these grades can be hugely beneficial. Especially if you have a child who is struggling with print handwriting including letter reversals, letter formations, a left-handed writer, or a child who struggles with delays or has a special need of some kind. I would encourage you to try cursive handwriting with them and see if they can pick it up faster and easier than print.

Research for Cursive Handwriting vs. Print

There is not a lot of evidence-based research articles on the benefits of cursive handwriting or cursive vs. print handwriting. I did some searches and came up with some interesting titles, but nothing truly answered the question of whether cursive or print was actually easier or better to start with. Here are the titles I found, however, in case you want to research some more. All of these come from the American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) and come with free PDFs at the links below.

What am I doing as a parent and therapist?

My daughter is 6 and has learned to write her name in print and also knows how to write most of her alphabet in print. We have started introducing some cursive pre-writing lines with her, but she has struggled some with those. I plan on introducing it slowly as we continue our homeschooling and as she shows an interest, which she has lately.

I'd love to hear what you think, do you plan on teaching print or cursive handwriting first?

For more handwriting help, check out my How to Improve Handwriting Skills resource page here.

Resources: 

Baker, Irene, MEd. “Cursive Handwriting: How Important Is It?” Montessori Services, 2013. Website. http://www.montessoriservices.com/ideas-insights/cursive-handwriting-how-important-is-it

Blumenfeld, Sam. “How Should We Teach Our Children to Write? Cursive First, Print Later.” The New American, June 2012. Website. http://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/11707-how-should-we-teach-our-children-to-write

Klemm, Willem R, Ph.D. “Biological and Psychological Benefits of Learning Cursive.” Psychology Today, August 2013, Website. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/memory-medic/201308/biological-and-psychology-benefits-learning-cursive

Logic of English “Why Teach Cursive First” Website. https://blog.logicofenglish.com/why-teach-cursive-first

You May Also Like:

Cursive prewriting line and stroke printables for preschoolers and kids.

Heather Greutman, COTA

Heather Greutman is a Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant with experience in school-based OT services for preschool through high school. She uses her background to share child development tips, tools, and strategies for parents, educators, and therapists. She is the author of many ebooks including The Basics of Fine Motor Skills, and Basics of Pre-Writing Skills, and co-author of Sensory Processing Explained: A Handbook for Parents and Educators.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

20 Comments

  1. I want to add another resource. A book titled Handwriting in America: A Cultural History by Tamara Plakins Thorton. Published by Yale University Press, May 25, 1998. From it I learned that students were not taught manuscript until the industrial age when print and signs were in manuscript and teachers thought that it would be easier to teach reading manuscript if they taught children to write the letters. It was not meant to become the main form of writing. Cursive was still considered the most efficient form of handwriting. Prior to that cursive was the only form of penmanship taught, typically when the child was 7 years old.
    I am repeatedly explaining to teachers that penmanship is not a developmental progression and you do not need to master manuscript before teaching cursive. Some children write more legibly with cursive than manuscript for the reasons outlined in the article your wrote. Luckily the 2 states that I have worked in as an OT added cursive writing to their own content standards. However, even though they teach cursive, the higher grades do not reinforce it so students go back to the more familiar manuscript.

  2. Lisa Meechan says:

    I’m enjoying your handwriting articles. I’d like to know what you think about teaching continuous manuscript (print) and the developmental stage for the “retracing” element in letters such as lowercase letters b, m, g, etc.

    Many programs say to lift your pencil and form the circle on the lowercase b but the programs that I have from OTs say to use a continuous stroke. Do you know of any research on continuous stroke? Is retracing a harder skill than drawing triangles? Where would retracing come in on the pre-writing developmental checklist? In my experience I have found that children need lots of help retracing. What do you think? Thank you!

    1. I don’t know about the developmental progression, but the reason the continuous stroke is considered to be easier than the “ball and stick” method is because it is often difficult for a child to pick up their pencil and place it back in the exact location for the next mark. So letter b sometimes ends up as a line through a circle or a line with a circle next to it. Also both b and d would start with a straight line down and then the child has to remember which side to put the circle, which leads to more reversals.

  3. Did any of your research indicate that learning cursive first has any impact on learning to read print since print is most often in manuscript form?

  4. Michelle Foster says:

    Hi Heather I am working with a 9 yr boy with autism. He is quite bright but has great difficulty with formation of letters. He is left handed and will write many letters (hmnrvw) from right to left. I can’t see to get him out of it. Any clues?

CONTENT DISCLAIMER: Heather Greutman is a Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant.
All information on the Website is for informational purposes only and is not a replacement for medical advice from a physician or your pediatrician. Please consult with a medical professional if you suspect any medical or developmental issues with your child. The information on the Websites does not replace the relationship between therapist and client in a one-on-one treatment session with an individualized treatment plan based on their professional evaluation. The information provided on the Website is provided “as is” without any representations or warranties, express or implied.

Do not rely on the information on the Website as an alternative to advice from your medical professional or healthcare provider. You should never delay seeking medical advice, disregard medical advice, or discontinue medical treatment as a result of any information provided on the Website. All medical information on the Website is for informational purposes only.

All activities outlined on the Website are designed for completion with adult supervision. Please use your own judgment with your child and do not provide objects that could pose a choking hazard to young children. Never leave a child unattended during these activities. Please be aware of and follow all age recommendations on all products used in these activities. Growing Hands-On Kids is not liable for any injury when replicating any of the activities found on this blog.

YOUR RESPONSIBILITY The Website was developed strictly for informational purposes. You understand and agree that you are fully responsible for your use of the information provided on the Website. Growing Hands-On Kids makes no representations, warranties, or guarantees. You understand that results may vary from person to person. Growing Hands-On Kids assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions that may appear on the Website.